The Alex Jones Show 2/2:Hour 2-National Guard Swine Flu Vaccine Riot Drill
Exclusive video!
National Guard Takes Over School In Swine Flu Vaccine Riot Drill Steve Watson Infowars.net Thursday, August 13, 2009 A High School in Maine is to be taken over by the National Guard today for the purposes of a drill that will see Guardsmen deal with unruly citizens begging for swine flu vaccines. Oxford Hills Comprehensive High School in Paris, ME, has been chosen as a distribution site for the H1N1 flu vaccine by state officials. Todays drill will enact a riot scenario after Gov. John Baldacci and Gen. John Libby, adjutant general of the Maine National Guard, agreed that measures should be in place to deal with a possible public rush for inoculations against swine flu. On Thursday morning, four or five National Guard Humvees will travel from Augusta to Paris with vials of fake serum. reports the Maine Sun Journal. The National Guardsmen will take on the roles of panicked citizens and military police and practice what they would do, such as using tear gas, in the case of a riot. The article continues. Local police will also liaise with the National Guard on the school grounds. The school itself will remain open, according to the report. Center for Disease Control figures state that there are 323 confirmed cases of H1N1 in Maine. One man has died from the disease, though he was said to have underlying health conditions that were worsened by the flu. www.infowars.com
Subscribe to comments on this postA flush toilet exists that dates back to 2000 BC.
Copyright 2009 Jellofart - Advertise With Us Jellofart Home | About Jellofart | Contact (Annoy) Jellofart | Shop our Store | Our Privacy Policy
March 21st, 2010 - 09:31
RIGHT ON NICKKK
March 21st, 2010 - 10:00
“The House of Bush: Born in a Bank” explains everything so well a 5th grader would understand it. Just the 1st chapter will be an eye opener. Hitler used the clergy with just one chapter: Romans 13.
March 21st, 2010 - 10:05
All forms of communitarianism by government are wrong and destructiv to sociaty.
But I will attack socialism most of all since people have the false sence that it is different to other forms of the same controllgrid.
The Nanny-State is about controll.
March 21st, 2010 - 10:26
Fair enough. I happen to agree that certain problems/projects will require nothing less than global support. At some point we have to get over this idea of petty rivalry and remember we are all human.
March 21st, 2010 - 10:37
What precisely is wrong with socialism?
March 21st, 2010 - 10:58
Then how come you were able to watch his video?
March 21st, 2010 - 11:15
i saw on the news a couple of days ago, where they were having people turn in their guns for a store gift card!! me and my husband could not belive all the dumb-ass people who was doing it! i guess that’s one way to get the guns from people-give us your gun and you get a free gift card!!! WOW what a great deal!!
March 21st, 2010 - 12:11
You could of course be right. We don’t know the details, but thievery it is regardless of perspective, and in any case the government is ultimately responsible. The root causes could be traced all the way back to deficit spending propped up by the federal reserve and the doctrine on which the house of cards rests: keynesian economics.
March 21st, 2010 - 13:08
I see, so your stance is that the government, effectively, promised to bail out the banks for them to hand out sub-prime loans. However, that alone wouldn’t prop up deficit spending, nor would the government need to make a deal with anything but the FED. AIG and other institutions wouldn’t need to be “rescued” as part of any deal or obligation, looking at it from that perspective.
I’d say its more appropriate to call the bailouts opportunistic thievery at that point, from that perspective.
March 21st, 2010 - 13:50
He works backwards from speculative and non-objective premises, trying to fit his presumptions back to reality by means of deductive rationalization.
March 21st, 2010 - 14:32
Yes, I’m thinking of the cause, not the effect.
March 21st, 2010 - 15:23
More surveillance and control could also be the result of fear of terror and/or political unrest following bad economic conditions. This is a delicate situation where more pressure from within could escalate the want for even more control. I don’t think the state intentionally wants to enslave its people. I think they are trying to do their best, but that their ideas are fundamentally wrong. I may of course be wrong.
March 21st, 2010 - 16:02
Backward curve fitting rationalization of facts with pre-speculative theories of intentions does not describe reality. In any situation you have people making money on everything. You run the risk of demonizing those who act on opportunity when you connect them with those responsible of creating the situation. There may not exist such a connection, and voila, you have conspiracy theory instead of facts.
March 21st, 2010 - 16:40
I assume you mean prior to the actual “bailout” then?
March 21st, 2010 - 17:10
I’m not talking about lending standards at this point in the cycle, but lending standards imposed at an earlier stage of the cycle.
March 21st, 2010 - 17:22
Eh, you could be right. To be honest I’m not sure what, if any, other nations that had an armed populace were able to successfully disarm them. Might be an interesting thing to study if I ever have enough time.
March 21st, 2010 - 17:56
In what way does his methods evade the “laws of logic”?
March 21st, 2010 - 18:46
i respect your opinion but i am very confident that they will never be able to disarm the american people at any level !!
March 21st, 2010 - 18:49
Any method that evades the laws of logic is invalid. A is A
March 21st, 2010 - 19:35
Do I know their intentions for each action?
No, of course not. Even if I did there’s nothing stopping them from changing how they’ll use an event in response to such speculation. And that part is speculation.
However, facts remain as to what effects the scare has had, as well as who and what is making money off of specific events. However, knowing their ultimate ambitions and intentions (if not specific), at least according to themselves, allows one to extrapolate possibilities.
March 21st, 2010 - 19:46
As I said to “PREPAREORSUFFER”, they’re crazy.
They’ve already supported, and gotten successfully, amazing surveillance and controls set on the British people, as well as Australia, and funding for it in China. America is still armed yes, and at the current rate they’re going they’ll fail miserably at pushing America further. However there is also still a fairly large anti-gun movement, and over time that movement could grow large enough to ban weapons. But no, not as its going now.
March 21st, 2010 - 19:51
I agree that the H1N1 is just another scare, but how do you know their intentions? You don’t. It could as well be a much needed diversion to keep people focused on other things than the economy. The latter is their main worry right now, and rightfully so as todays economic conditions could lead to political unrest. Add a bit socialism to the mix and you’ll end up with a highly flamable mixture. It’s much easier for those in charge if most people are worried about the flu.
March 21st, 2010 - 20:12
Yes and no. You’re working based on the assumption that the American People won’t put up with it. And you’re probably right, at least on certain levels. However, that doesn’t mean it can’t be done. Nor does it mean they need to disarm the nation. They need only turn people’s suspicions against each other rather than against them. However, to this point, they are failing miserably at that.
It doesn’t mean they won’t still try however, even if not immediately.
March 21st, 2010 - 20:17
That’s not entirely true. While most banks certainly don’t “create money” in general (though the FED can and does), they do get a benefit from the bailouts, and they certainly haven’t lowered lending standards. Indeed, outside of interbank lending, the loans do not seem to be flowing. However, while they have such liquidity, they can buy up other banks and assets at pre-inflation prices, and even less with financial collapses.
March 21st, 2010 - 20:32
They don’t even have the power to sell “free” healt care to “the people”. They are nothings and will fail. They would have to disarm the nation first. It won’t happen. It’s a cultural fact they can’t escape. If they try they don’t even know what country they are trying to run.